This is a question on which no clear direction is available
and keeping in line with the general trend of tax judgments there are
conflicting views held by the various courts and Tribunals in the country.
When it comes for section 194 C/J , Tax has to be deducted
on payment of “ANY SUM” to
the recipient covered under the section, whereas u/s 195 mandate the deduction
of TDS on payment of “INCOME”
to NRI.
In the case of mere reimbursement of expenses, TDS
need not be effected as ruled in the case of reimbursement of out of pocket
expenses to a noted Law firm .Clifford Chance 82 ITD 106(Mum). The most
important recent Judgment in Mahindra & Mahindra’s case reported in 10
SOT 896 Mumbai ITAT has also held that reimbursement of expenses not having
the character of income chargeable to tax under the provisions of the IT Act
cannot be subject to WHT (WITH HOLDING TAX) .
However where the cost of services is charged and recovered
by way of reimbursement, even without any profit element TDS will be applicable
as ruled in the case of Arthur Andersen & Co by the Mumbai tribunal
reported in 94 TTJ 736 (Mum) .
There are also judgments which reflect that TDS under
Section 195 will be applicable even on mere reimbursement of expenses. This
view finds support in the decisions given by Cochin Refineries 222 ITR 354
(Kar) and HNS VSAT Inc 95 ITD 157 (Del ITAT) and also in Hindalco 278ITR 125
(AT).
No comments:
Post a Comment